Computer vision, audio and video AI
Recognition and generation are different tasks.
What you will learn
- Explain: different modalities, different errors
- Apply the idea in an example: Computer vision, audio and video AI
- Recognize limitations and verify the exercise outcome
Recognition and generation are different tasks. Audio and video need temporal-order checks as well as content checks.
This is a conceptual or external lab. It does not assume the application exposes every control described.
How it works, step by step
Different modalities, different errors
A multimodal model can process multiple input types, but exact support depends on the model and integration. OCR extracts image text; vision may describe objects or structure. Audio can be transcribed or generated, while video adds temporal order. A blurred label or cropped unit can completely change the conclusion. Preserve the original and the information’s location. In RAG, an image may become indexed descriptive text without native multimodal embeddings. File acceptance does not imply correct content understanding.
How learning changes a model
Training data is the set of examples used to adjust model parameters. Supervised learning includes a target, such as “spam”. Unsupervised learning finds structure, such as customer groups. Self-supervised learning creates targets from data, for example predicting following text. Validation helps choose settings; the test set stays separate until final evaluation. A model that memorizes examples and fails on new data is overfitting. A proper split prevents information from the test set leaking into training.
Define success before optimizing
Prepare representative requests and expected answers or properties. Include ordinary cases, ambiguity, missing data and tool errors. For RAG, measure evidence retrieval separately from answer correctness. Recall@k measures the share of relevant evidence found in the first k results; precision@k measures the share of returned results that are relevant. For agents, also track actions, permissions and stopping. An LLM-as-judge can speed evaluation but needs calibration against humans. Do not change prompt, model and index simultaneously if you want to understand what improved results.
The visual map
Follow the solid arrows for the main flow. Dashed blue arrows supply data or context; dashed pink arrows show feedback or returning results. Colors and shapes distinguish models, stores, decisions and outputs. On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to follow the entire diagram.
A complete example
Vision classifies images, detection locates products and OCR reads labels. Speech-to-text transcribes requests, text-to-speech voices them and video follows changes across frames.
Try it yourself
- Design inputs and outputs for a label, voice message and installation clip.
- Record the input, source and expected outcome before running the experiment. Use only the fictional data in the example.
- Follow the diagram stages. At every step record what information is received and produced; do not confuse intermediate output with the final outcome.
- Repeat after removing necessary information or making the input ambiguous. Check whether the system clarifies, stops or invents an answer.
- Compare with the explained solution. Keep the configuration, date, result and an explanation for differences. Change one thing and retest.
An explained solution
Choose the required output: category, bounding box, text or sequence; verify units, names and timings. A successful exercise lets you show the connection between input, stages and outcome. When information is missing, a cautious answer is more useful than invented details. Compare more than style: check conditions, sources and operations too.
When it helps and what can go wrong
A transcript may misrecognize the product identifier. Choose this approach when it improves a measured need. Keep a simple baseline and compare outcomes using identical inputs. One successful example does not establish reliability in every situation.
Check your understanding
Does image upload prove native multimodal embeddings?
No. The pipeline may be vision → text description → text embedding.
Why not evaluate only on training data?
We want performance on new situations, not proof of memorization.
What outcome should this exercise produce?
Choose the required output: category, bounding box, text or sequence; verify units, names and timings.
Words to remember
- OCR: Extracting text from an image.
- Overfitting: The model fits the examples it has seen too closely.
- Regresie / Regression: A change that breaks a previously correct case.
Sources and your next step
To prepare: X01 — Classical ML and structured data